Casino profile

Fat Panda Casino

Player complaints and reviews about Fat Panda Casino, plus its operator (SG International N.V.), licences and welcome offers.

Closedfatpandacasino.com

fatpandacasino.com

About

Fat Panda Casino belongs to the SG International N.V. affiliate programme. This site is no longer operating: the domain does not respond or has changed hands. The site launched in 2023. It holds a licence from Curacao Gaming Control Board.

Player Intelligence

37 records

What players report about Fat Panda Casino on review and complaint sites: complaints, reviews and the sites’ own player ratings.

Total complaints

67% resolved, of those with a known outcome

Total reviews

Across all review sites

Player rating

4.1 / 5

casino.ru 4.7 · Trustpilot 3.5

GEO markets

Countries stated on 35% of records

Fat Panda Casino complaints and reviews in figures

Every figure below is computed from the complaints and reviews collected about Fat Panda Casino, the way Player Intelligence PRO computes it.

Since 2023, players have posted 6 complaints and 31 reviews about Fat Panda Casino on 3 sites. In the 12 months to November 5, 2026, they filed no complaints and posted no reviews.

Reviewers give Fat Panda Casino 4.61 out of 5 on average over 31 rated reviews, against 3.44 across all brands. 90% of the ratings are four or five stars, and 9.7% are one or two. The review sites’ own scores average 4.1 out of 5 across 2 sites. By that score, Fat Panda Casino ranks 634th of 4,286 rated casinos. Reviewers most often praise “Bonuses” (13 reviews), “Games” (9 reviews) and “Withdrawals” (6 reviews). The most common criticism concerns “Bonuses” (6 reviews).

Problem shares are of the complaints with a labelled problem, topic shares of those with a topic, country shares of the records that state one. “12 months” counts records with an exact date in the 365 days to November 5, 2026. “All brands” covers the 11,910 brands Player Intelligence tracks.

Ask the AI analyst about Fat Panda Casino: one market, one period, a payment method or a comparison with another brand.

What the assistant can do

Block 01

Complaints count

Complaints filed per year or month, across every complaint site.

Point at a bar to read it

202320242025

Complaints count

Period	Value
2023	2
2024	2
2025	2

Block 02

Complaint categories

Bonus33%2
Account17%1
KYC / verification17%1
Technical17%1
Withdrawal17%1

Share of complaints by category.complaints

Block 03

Complaint status

Resolved67%4
Unresolved33%2

Outcomes as the sites report them. “Closed without an outcome” is a case the site closed without saying who was right.complaints

Block 04

Reviews count

Player reviews posted per year or month, across every review site.

Point at a bar to read it

20232024

Reviews count

Period	Value
2023	28
2024	3

Block 05

Review stars

How the rated reviews split by star.

5 stars90%28
1 star9.7%3

Share of 31 rated reviews. Ratings on other scales are converted to five stars and rounded up, as in Player Intelligence PRO.reviews

Block 06

What reviewers praise and criticise

The aspects reviews name either way: one review can praise one thing and criticise another.

Praised

Bonuses46%13
Games32%9
Withdrawals21%6
Fairness & RTP14%4
Customer support14%4
KYC / verification7.1%2

Share of the 28 reviews that name at least one aspect.reviews

Criticised

Bonuses21%6
Fairness & RTP11%3
Withdrawals11%3
Customer support7.1%2
Games3.6%1
KYC / verification3.6%1

Share of the 28 reviews that name at least one aspect.reviews

Block 07

Rating history

The average star rating of reviews posted in each period, out of 5. By month only where every month has enough ratings.

Point at a bar to read it

4.57

20232024

Rating history

Period	Value
2023	4.57
2024	5

Block 08

Stats by GEO

The ten countries players most often state, complaints and reviews together.

Canada23%3
Montenegro15%2
New Zealand15%2
Brazil7.7%1
United Kingdom7.7%1
Mexico7.7%1
Norway7.7%1
Philippines7.7%1
Poland7.7%1

Share of the records whose source states a country – never guessed from language or currency.records

Block 09

Year by year

Complaints, their outcomes and reviews per calendar year.

Year by year
Year	Complaints	Resolved	Reviews	Average rating
2025	2	–	0	–
2024	2	–	3	–
2023	2	–	28	4.57

A dash means too little data for that year.

Block 10

Where the records come from

The independent sites the complaints and reviews were collected from.

Where the records come from
Site	Complaints	Reviews	Site’s score
casino.ru	–	24	4.7 / 5
Casino Guru	6	3	–
Trustpilot	–	4	3.5 / 5

Block 11

Latest complaints and reviews

The newest records about Fat Panda Casino as facts: our label, the status or the stars, the player’s country and the site. The text stays on that site – follow the link to read it.

ComplaintMar 31, 2025
Bonus winnings confiscated
Unresolved
Mexico · Casino Guru
ComplaintJan 2, 2025
Bonus not credited
Unresolved
Canada · Casino Guru
ComplaintDec 9, 2024
Verification delay
Resolved
Brazil · Casino Guru
ReviewSep 9, 2024
5.0 of 5 stars
Canada · Casino Guru
ReviewApr 17, 2024
5.0 of 5 stars
New Zealand · Trustpilot

0 player records in the last 30 days. Explore them in Player Intelligence PRO

Every complaint and review behind these numbers – with filters, comparison, GEO, platforms, operators and monitoring – in Player Intelligence.

Get All Data

Player ratings from casino.ru, Trustpilot.

Questions about Fat Panda Casino

Who owns Fat Panda Casino?

Fat Panda Casino is operated by SG International N.V. and runs under the SG International N.V. affiliate programme.

Is Fat Panda Casino licensed?

Yes. Fat Panda Casino holds a licence from Curacao Gaming Control Board.

When was Fat Panda Casino founded?

Fat Panda Casino launched in 2023. The site has since closed; its profile is kept for reference.

What do players say about Fat Panda Casino?

Players have filed 6 complaints and written 31 reviews about Fat Panda Casino. Players rate Fat Panda Casino 4.1 out of 5 on average across the 2 sites that publish one.

What do players like and dislike about Fat Panda Casino?

Praised most: “Bonuses”, “Games” and “Withdrawals”. Criticised most: “Bonuses”. 90% of the rated reviews give four or five stars, and 9.7% give one or two.